Comparison

Sigma Auth vs Privy

Privy gives EVM applications embedded wallets and social login. Sigma Auth gives users a Bitcoin anchored identity whose key never leaves their device. Strip away the feature lists and the comparison is one question: who holds the key your users sign with.

At a glance

Choose Privy if

  • You are building on EVM and want users onboarded without a wallet install
  • Social login is the front door and the wallet should appear quietly behind it
  • You want gas sponsorship and funding flows already wired up
  • Managed key infrastructure is an acceptable dependency for your product

Choose Sigma Auth if

  • Users should hold their own keys, with no share retained by a provider
  • Identity should be anchored on Bitcoin and portable through a backup the user controls
  • Access should be gated on what a user actually holds
  • Self hosting under MIT matters to your risk model
Key custody

The difference in one picture

Everything else on this page follows from these two diagrams.

Key custody, embedded wallets compared with Sigma AuthIn an embedded wallet model the provider holds a share of the signing key and takes part in every signature. In the Sigma Auth model the private key stays on the user device and the server only ever holds the public key.EMBEDDED WALLETUserholds one sharerequests a signatureProvider key serviceholds the other shareco-signsSigned actionprovider was requiredSIGMA AUTHUser deviceholds the whole keysends a signatureSigma Authholds the public key onlyverifiesSession issuedno key was shared
Embedded wallets. The signing key is split so that the provider holds a share. That is what makes recovery and sponsorship easy, and it is also why the provider is part of every signature.
Sigma Auth. The private key is generated and kept on the user device. The server stores the public half and checks signatures against it, so it can verify a user without ever being able to act as one.
Side by side

Feature comparison

PrivySigma Auth
Chain focusEVM chains including Ethereum, Base, and PolygonAttestation hashes anchored on Bitcoin SV. The identity itself can be generated from a key already held on Ethereum, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Litecoin, Avalanche, ICP, and Solana
Wallet modelEmbedded wallets with server side key shardingNon custodial. The key stays on the user device
Key custodyPrivy holds a key shareSigma never receives the private key
Primary authenticationEmail, social OAuth, passkeysBitcoin signatures, plus OAuth providers
Identity modelEmail based accountsBAP cryptographic identity, anchored on chain
RecoveryProvider assisted recoveryEncrypted backup file, portable across devices
Access controlToken gating through smart contractsNFT ownership, token balance, BAP allowlist
LicenseProprietaryMIT
Self hostedNoYes
Pricing modelFree tier, then paid tiersFree self hosted. The hosted service currently has no paywall
Onboarding frictionVery low. No wallet install requiredLow with an existing wallet. Otherwise a key is generated on first use

Verified on 21 August 2026.

Credit where it is due

Where Privy is strong

Onboarding without a wallet install

The wallet install step is the single largest drop off in most crypto products. Removing it is a real result, and embedded wallets remove it completely.

Broad EVM coverage

If your contracts live on Ethereum, Base, or another EVM chain, Privy meets your application where it already is rather than asking it to move.

Funding and sponsorship are wired

Paymaster style gas sponsorship and funding paths ship as part of the product, which removes a meaningful amount of integration work.

Social login as the front door

Users who would never describe themselves as crypto users can sign in with an account they already have and end up with a wallet without thinking about it.

The other side

Where Sigma differs

Custody

Users hold their own keys

No key share is retained by Sigma. A user's ability to act cannot be suspended, and Sigma cannot sign on their behalf even if compelled to.

Interop

The key you already hold is the one you use

The attestation hashes are anchored on BSV. The key that generates the identity can be one a user already holds on Ethereum, Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Litecoin, Avalanche, ICP, or Solana. EVM chains and Bitcoin share the secp256k1 curve, so an Ethereum wallet also yields a BSV address the user can recover independently. See the EVM path.

EthereumBitcoinBitcoin CashBitcoin SVLitecoinAvalancheICPSolana
Recovery

Recovery is a file, not a request

An encrypted backup moves an identity between devices. Restoring is something the user does, not something they ask a provider to approve.

Authorization

Access follows ownership

Gate on NFT ownership, token balance, or a BAP allowlist, verified against the chain rather than against a subscription table.

The trade is real, so here it is plainly. Non custodial means the user can lose access in ways an embedded wallet can rescue. A provider holding a key share can help someone who has lost their device. A provider holding nothing cannot, by design. Sigma's answer is an encrypted backup the user stores and an OAuth linked restore path, which reduces the risk without pretending it is gone.
Migration

Moving from Privy

Four steps. The order matters more than the speed, because the custody model changes underneath your users rather than beside them.

  1. 01

    Inventory the user base and the wallet types

    Split your users into those who connected an external wallet and those who were given an embedded one. The two groups migrate differently, and the ratio decides how much of the work is communication rather than code. What Privy can export, and in what shape, is the first thing to confirm in Privy's current docs.

  2. 02

    Map embedded wallet users to self held keys

    Users who connected their own wallet already hold a key, so they can sign into Sigma with it directly. Embedded wallet users hold nothing today, so plan an explicit step where a key is generated or imported on first sign in, followed by the encrypted backup. Whether existing embedded key material can leave the provider at all is a question to confirm in Privy's current docs rather than assume.

  3. 03

    Run both providers in parallel behind Better Auth

    Sigma ships as @sigma-auth/better-auth-plugin, so a project already running Better Auth can mount Sigma alongside its existing provider rather than swapping one for the other on a single night. Users move as they sign in, and you keep a way back for as long as you need one.

  4. 04

    Cut over once the traffic has moved

    When the remaining share of sign ins through the old provider is small enough to handle by hand, make Sigma the default and retire the parallel path. Keep the old read path available slightly longer than feels necessary, because the last few users are always the ones who took a long holiday.

Two things to check rather than assume. Credentials do not carry across, so a key based identity is generated or imported the first time each user signs in. And the export surface of any embedded wallet product changes over time, so confirm what is exportable in Privy's current docs before you design the migration around it.
Next step

Try the wallet path

Connect a wallet you already have, sign once, and see what a Sigma identity looks like before committing to anything. You can also review all the alternatives first.